In a controversial article, Toronto Sun reporter Steve Simmons made some fairly egregious allegations regarding Auston Matthews' recent trip to Germany and ESPN journalist Rachel Doerrie has taken exception with a post on X blasting Simmons:
Doerrie took umbrage with the fact that Simmons made some bold claims about the doctor Auston Matthews saw in Germany, as he's known to have some controversial treatment methods.
So what exactly led to Doerrie calling out Simmons?
Known himself for being controversial and often stirring the pot when uncalled for, Simmons wrote about Dr. Hans Wilhelm Muller-Wohlfahrt, a sports medicine specialist based in Germany.
Known for his work with athletes like Usain Bolt and Christian McCaffrey, he's helped a lot of athletes heal from serious injuries.
But his methods also leave some questioning the validity of the treatment although he's been quite successful.
Simmons touched on the different naturopathic methods Muller-Wohlfahrt uses but couldn't confirm whether or not Matthews underwent some of the more drastic measures.
Although he sparks a bit of controversy, there's no arguing his success and having been a part of not only Bayern Munich's medical team, he was responsible for Team Germany in the World Cup; a job of utmost importance.
Simmons was fairly impartial in his description of Simmons and also speculated on the nature of Matthews' injury claiming unidentified sources; something Simmons took offense to when Matthews and the Leafs did it.
It's a brazen piece of journalism that was more suited for an op-ed as opposed to hard journalism because there is clear bias from Simmons against the methods of Muller-Wohlfahrt.
Q1: Why was ESPN Reporter Rachel Doerrie upset?
A1: ESPN reporter Rachel Doerrie took offense to the fact that Toronto Sun reporter Steve Simmons made some bold claims regarding Auston Matthews' choice to visit a German sports doctor.
Q2: How come Dr. Muller-Wohlfahrt is controversial?
A2: The famous German doctor is controversial for the treatment methods he uses which could be considered against the norm of science. He uses traditional and naturopathic methods as well as alternative diagnostic systems.
In closing, Rachel Doerrie has every right to be upset with Simmons' comments as they do paint a successful and renowned doctor as not, and it's clear his success and consistent trust in high-pressure situations leads credence to his medical abilities.
POLL | ||
Do you think it's controversial for athletes to seek alternative treatment like Auston Matthews did? | ||
Yes | 176 | 28.3 % |
No | 445 | 71.7 % |
List of polls |