A lot of talk recently has been over which pieces the Maple Leafs can bring in, although the number attached to those players always draws immense scrutiny by fans and critics. Does Toronto overpay for a potential win-now scenario, or build the team deeply and make a run in a year or two?
Well according to Elliotte Friedman, the team may be able to have their cake and eat it too.
The Maple Leafs front office isn't shy about handing out luxurious contracts, and while it's been great in some aspects, it's failed spectacularly with others.
But Friedman mentioned on Saturday that teams are going to work with an internal cap more; leading to less money being dished out for those elite and above average players:
As not only the NHL's most popular, but profitable franchise, but one that is synonymous with hockey, there's no doubt Toronto is one of those teams willing to approach or potentially exceed that $100M potential salary cap.
With rumors that potentially Connor McDavid might entertain an offer when his deal is up coincides perfectly with the rising cap, and with a lot of teams hesitant to offer such a massive deal (even though it's McDavid), Toronto's chances increase exponentially.
It's also good news for the team because of their long contracts offered to the veteran defensemen.
Chris Tanev, Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Jake McCabe and potentially Morgan Rielly are all making a combined $20M+ for the next several seasons, but with a widening cap; making moves to add isn't as difficult financially.
The rising cap plays perfectly into Toronto's hands, as one of the wealthier and more prominent teams in the entire League, they will be able to offer more money and term to players come the next few seasons.
But you need to spend money to make money, and nothing makes more money than a Stanley Cup victory.
POLL | ||
JANVIER 26 | 575 ANSWERS Toronto Maple Leafs To Gain Major Advantage Over Other Teams In The Coming Years Do you think Toronto will hold an advantage over other teams when it comes to free agent signings? | ||
Yes | 212 | 36.9 % |
No | 363 | 63.1 % |
List of polls |